figure that day are without history, it is the right time to tell the man who did not want her legs.
It 's a true story, with a great sense of news reports Susie Orbach in his saggetto "Bodies", slim reading so much about what the whole issue: I try to summarize in a few lines though , the re- immediately say, "Bodies" is just to read. So, this guy had "all legs" as if it has one of the nose is too long or bumpy, as it has some wide hips or big ass, with the difference that he did not need any adjective to not bear his legs. He wanted to be without you "saw" no, could not agree to live in that body because he felt monstrous with legs. Of course, all the doctors sent him to which he turned away, of course, tried, or tried, to heal the brain first, but all in vain: his legs in a closed cylinder freezer, let them go gangrenous and had to amputate. After which he lived happily.
When you stop shivering, the question is, why a nose, boobs, belly, feet, legs, hair, skin. .. yes, and no legs? True, no one chooses to be amputated the nose (for now), but did mention that the girl was made to remove the breast to overcome genetic predisposition to cancer breast: and found those who have done the smart operation, of course.
Be ', the answer is intuitive rather than logical, involves what appears to be an acceptable threshold without the need (or possibility) to explain rationally, but many open questions that Orbach explores through anecdotes and professional reflections.
Not everything is shared, the book, but the scope of questions is very wide: we are the first generation, Orbach says, by which the body is not a gift nor a coincidence, nor a valuable tanmeno working tool, but a "construction" of which to choose size, shape, appearance and substance. And it is paradoxical that while the body we need less and less is increasingly performed, even paradoxical ways like wrestling or ipersessualizzazione.
The boys are not taught to use their body so useful if themselves and others, but to "keep fit" for an operation formally given to the health or success, but actually quite an end in itself. The foolish vanity, so well taken around by the writers of the past, is today a sign of "commitment" strength of character and determination: Sir Walter Elliot in Jane Austen's masterpiece portrait of futility, today would be a hero. Or, more easily, the head of our government.
But above all, he notes Orbach, such use and manufacture of bodies is one of the spoils of globalization, which threatens biodiversity, even in the form of the face and eyes, color of skin and hair. The riots in the Mediterranean, which also bring with them the winds of freedom and justice will hopefully most, if not fall prey to religious fanaticism will open new markets from this point of view, as has happened in Eastern Europe and especially in Asia .
The Aryan race has finally found the selection methods more refined and efficient: it is "choice" with the appearance of free will.
And we, who are not Aryans but just short, and that we "just" struggle with sagging breasts, pleats of fat rolls, hips, stomachs protruding (not to mention wrinkles, lack of hair and hallux valgus) of course we can use the "incli, maybe quotes: regalarme custom seems to have been at least one for the eighteenth.
Or, alternatively, to those who in the 50s were called shell-bras and today, for some reason, are considered sexy, to which were added today, all sorts of clothing restraints. The Rinascente has a number winking, with drawings of fat rendered invisible, sizes disappeared, raised roof (with tape that pulls from above, really!), Ass back or extruded, molded legs. "Oh, to '- I told KGgB, seeing that I was a girl was called" corset "and sexy had nothing - look, there were already forty years ago!" And you (how I love my daughters, sometimes) she said, grimly: "Yeah, and you have burned them."
Then I thought, welcome back, corsets. It will be easier, at least, burn again you that two fake tits. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment