"Thousands of women have said or wrote what they thought of their men, their men, men, and their ideas were accepted by the protagonists of so many brave effort at most as an example of science fiction, or frustration, misery and madness. Among them, the American Valerie Solanas is that which is expressed with certainty, security, and violence typical of the secular men's opinions on women, in his "Manifesto for the elimination of the male, "written in 1967. It 'was obviously taken for mad. Since then, is not going badly, from a nursing home to another, living in miserable pensions, was destroyed by his sincerity, the illusion that for women there was the civil right to freedom of speech. He said for example: "The male is a biological accident ... It 'not a female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene level already. Being male is to be calibrated, limited in sensitivity. Virility is a congenital disorder, males are emotional cripples. " Go on for about forty pages, and its ferocity has not shocked, he made me laugh: A poor woman, a neurotic outcast a
lesbian and a mythomaniac. Too bad that for centuries, from St. Paul to Caesar Musatti, from St. Thomas to Cesare Lombroso, by Otto Weininger in Proudhon, by Indro Montanelli to Amintore Fanfani, say ninety-five percent of men (but not all) have been written and said and thought and reviews carried out on women far more reckless, and not only no one has judged mentally ill or queens, but more or less the great masters of thought and customs, often lights of civilization and progress. " Although, of course, there is little to laugh, except the thought - for now posthumously, but you never know - how, for a short season, they We beggars: "E 'then that its obstinacy - Natalia says, without hesitation or elsewhere speaks also of" masculine stupidity "- his inability to understand, its touchiness being male when he was reproached as a problem, and not appreciated as the normal state of one who is better, it is impossible to understand. "
"He saw her from" the book is titled "writing project and to my great amusement," says Natalia in the brief preface entitled
'Trent' years (almost) in vain. " But on this title we must give it a bit 'wrong, at least you will immediately notice a change: today, if one just wants his say on an issue such as the dignity of women (very fashionable) or the defense of abortion law (nooo, out , out!) is a must it be preceded by the words "I'm not a feminist, but ...". And 'cross a sentence, we also use a lot in his left: he had never been that men are afraid of us again, eh?
'Trent' years (almost) in vain. " But on this title we must give it a bit 'wrong, at least you will immediately notice a change: today, if one just wants his say on an issue such as the dignity of women (very fashionable) or the defense of abortion law (nooo, out , out!) is a must it be preceded by the words "I'm not a feminist, but ...". And 'cross a sentence, we also use a lot in his left: he had never been that men are afraid of us again, eh?
But then there are the puny little groups, the irreducible that sometimes can be summarized in one phrase the fact, as this photograph in the banner exposed yesterday in Rome by a group of feminists precisely: and never has been so excruciatingly real as today. Happy March 8, girls.
0 comments:
Post a Comment